Debate on Controversy over Hindu Gods - Vishwa Bandhu Gupta & Acharya Dh...

All the participants appears to be fool including the anchor. Off course
we have to bar Vishva Bandhu Gupta, because he has stuck to the point,
but he has been not allowed to explain the point extensively.

There is nothing like defining defining Hinduism on the IT Appellate Bench decision.

None
of the participant including Baba Ramdev has read the judgement. Swami
Agnivesh has also gone out of point or has not touched the significant
point. The approach of the anchor is most foolish and perverted. The
anchor has tried to see that the discussion remains concentrated on
defining Hinduism and to make a fun of Hinduism. The other two Hindu
religious leaders are not only illiterate but sense less.
Now all
should know and they are supposed to know that the "NGO Trusts" which
are working for serving the people, they enjoy certain privilege under
IT. Their working expenses even if goes beyond 5% are exempted from
Income Tax. As for religious trust, the working expenses should be
limited to 5% on maintenance of Gods. However if the trust doing some
public welfare too, then the limits of overhead expenses are further
extended to be en-par with other trusts.
But so far Hindu religion is
concern, the expenditure on God is much more, because of performing
pooja, providing and maintaining Gods belonging and many other
traditions. In Hinduism there are lots of rituals prescribed under
recognized religious books. Hinduism is not comparable with other
religions in maintaining rituals. The Hindu rituals are far more
expensive and cannot be covered within 5% of the income. There by the
Income Tax Appellate Bench has given proper decision. But the anchor has
instigated the Hindu Religious leaders  to get upset. The said leaders
foolishly trapped themselves in the irrelevant point of definition.